07.10.2026, 00:21
(This post was last modified: 07.10.2026, 00:22 by Borje Hagsten.)
The problem with AI "programming", as I see it, is that while it can generate code quickly, you still have to read and test what it produces carefully and make sure the code will do exactly what you want in all possible cases. I can compare that to taking over a project from another programmer, where - if it's a big code - it can take days and weeks to follow and understand each step in code, then add a lot of time rewriting bad stuff and enhance code with better, faster and more secure ways to do this and that.
I once did this with PB Edit and PB Forms, when I started working for Bob back in 2004 and I can tell you - to dive into to MB's of code written and updated by several different programmers over the years took some time and effort. I can see similar or even worse problems, picking up on complicated code generated by an AI engine, where one knows there will be bugs and bad code hidden all over the place.
I guess it all boils done to - "I'm too old for this shi..."
I once did this with PB Edit and PB Forms, when I started working for Bob back in 2004 and I can tell you - to dive into to MB's of code written and updated by several different programmers over the years took some time and effort. I can see similar or even worse problems, picking up on complicated code generated by an AI engine, where one knows there will be bugs and bad code hidden all over the place.
I guess it all boils done to - "I'm too old for this shi..."
