23.01.2026, 20:40
(This post was last modified: 23.01.2026, 21:10 by Robert Alvarez.)
kurds reply
On the second sample , get one blank msgbox and then a msgbox with "T"?
On the third sample did not get the second msgbox at all. change to ? "xx "+decoded$ and seems to skip this code line?
------
dale y. second sample get ".This is my secret mes" only
dale y. third sample get "This is my secret message. 5"
Have not yet look over dale's code to look for problem.
Yes these sample code were AI generated.
which is best encoder Caesar Cipher, XOR Encoding, or Binary Write with Random Mask
Comparison of Methods:
Binary Write with Random Mask (Best): When the random mask (key) is as long as the message, unique, and kept secret, this method is fundamentally unbreakable. It is essentially a One-Time Pad.
XOR Encoding (Moderate/Weak): Offers speed and simplicity. If used with a single-byte or repeating key, it is easily broken. It is commonly used in malware for simple obfuscation.
Caesar Cipher (Worst): A basic substitution cipher with only 25 possible keys (in English), making it trivial to break with modern computing.
For high-security needs, the random mask approach is superior, whereas Caesar and basic XOR are generally for educational purposes or, at best, lightweight obfuscation.
do not know what "One-Time Pad." in Binary Write means. Looking for code to reuse again and again , not one time.?
On the second sample , get one blank msgbox and then a msgbox with "T"?
On the third sample did not get the second msgbox at all. change to ? "xx "+decoded$ and seems to skip this code line?
------
dale y. second sample get ".This is my secret mes" only
dale y. third sample get "This is my secret message. 5"
Have not yet look over dale's code to look for problem.
Yes these sample code were AI generated.
which is best encoder Caesar Cipher, XOR Encoding, or Binary Write with Random Mask
Comparison of Methods:
Binary Write with Random Mask (Best): When the random mask (key) is as long as the message, unique, and kept secret, this method is fundamentally unbreakable. It is essentially a One-Time Pad.
XOR Encoding (Moderate/Weak): Offers speed and simplicity. If used with a single-byte or repeating key, it is easily broken. It is commonly used in malware for simple obfuscation.
Caesar Cipher (Worst): A basic substitution cipher with only 25 possible keys (in English), making it trivial to break with modern computing.
For high-security needs, the random mask approach is superior, whereas Caesar and basic XOR are generally for educational purposes or, at best, lightweight obfuscation.
do not know what "One-Time Pad." in Binary Write means. Looking for code to reuse again and again , not one time.?